Overall, this discussion has shown that Bryan D. Dietrich is correct when he argues that people become weak when they rely on others to solve their problems. It has been shown that relying on others to solve one's problem produces weakness in a range of ways. In every case, a person facing a problem always has the potential to face the problem and use it to become stronger. When a person ignores this potential and relies on others instead of solving the problem, they become continually weaker. In effect, a person who relies on others is choosing not to rely on themselves. In doing so, a person...
Instead, the person will only become increasingly reliant on others, which also means continually losing control over their own lives and continually becoming weaker.
This may seem cruel and ungenerous, but Emerson would argue that the most generous thing that can be done for people is to help them become individuals. That will benefit them more than tossing a dollar in the alms box. Hence, through his essay, he hopes to encourage others on their road to self-reliance. The last few lines of "Self-Reliance" call on the readers to be brave and to trust
He is right in thinking that people have lost their sense of personal identity in order to put across behaviors that provides them with social acceptance. 2. Frederick Jackson Turner's first chapter in "The Significance of the Frontier in American History" makes it possible for readers to understand the writer's perspective concerning westward expansion in the U.S. And the effects that this expansion has had on the American people as a
Self-Reliance....Thoughts on the Frontier in American History. Reaction paper: Self-reliance The concept of self-reliance is extremely important in the discourse of politics today, as people argue that self-reliance from the federal government is a very important value. For Ralph Waldo Emerson, however, the world had a different meaning and resonance. First and foremost, self-reliance for Emerson meant the citizen was true to his or her ideals, versus conforming to the ideas
Another point that Emerson presents in his essay is his critique of people's conformity to social norms and rules. For him, conformity marks the death of progress in human society because it hinders individuals to explore and discover their true 'selves,' and hone their skills and knowledge that they consider necessary for their personal development. He further explains why society condones non-conformity or the pursuit of one's self-interest: "For nonconformity
Self-Reliance Explain at least 3 different sources of suffering in Leo Tolstoy's the Death of Ivan Ilych The Death of Ivan Ilych by Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy is a novel penned in 1886 by a great Russian author and perhaps an even greater moralist in regards to the essence of suffering. There are three core aspects of suffering delineated over the course of the novel, namely the suffering of the physical body
But one hand, while Emerson's statements are supposed to be true for all human beings, it is hard not to wonder -- isn't this the type of total self-confidence that can lead to tyranny? How can a nation exist, composed entirely of such complete individualists, with no common background, sense of history, or tradition -- or, most importantly, no sense of responsibility to society? What if every human being is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now